tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1028754504150632835.post4005108720210597346..comments2010-05-20T11:22:22.732-07:00Glenn Abelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06695180343063387358noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1028754504150632835.post-80293270220685533692009-10-02T16:39:32.552-07:002009-10-02T16:39:32.552-07:00I wouldn&#39;t do it. You can&#39;t count on Google knowing which web page holds the original content.<br /><br />I just had a case where a Russian scraper was getting all the SERPs credit for some of my work, which was stolen from my DVD blog art and all.<br /><br />Meaning Google can&#39;t reliably tell the difference between RSS scrapers and producers of 100 percent original content. Scary.<br /><br />Instead, I&#39;d advise doing a serious rewrite on some content you own -- I think Google wants 60 percent different or something -- and post that. <br /><br />As for the SEO value of article sites, I don&#39;t have experience there, but if it was an important tactic we&#39;d all being doing it. Make sure you&#39;re getting a follow link from the author text or forget it.Glenn Abelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06695180343063387358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1028754504150632835.post-47460472071473529912009-08-19T13:39:13.616-07:002009-08-19T13:39:13.616-07:00Glenn,<br /><br />How does posting content to a site such as associated content fit into this? Am I killing my page rank by submitting my original posts to AC?Vagohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07274717585397773710noreply@blogger.com